National Cyber Warfare Foundation (NCWF) Forums


US v. SBF: in closing statements, the US relied heavily on evidence to argue SBF is guilty and said he was "greedy" while SBF's defense


0 user ratings
2023-11-02 10:39:34
milo
Policy / Governance

 - archive -- 

Elizabeth Lopatto / The Verge:

US v. SBF: in closing statements, the US relied heavily on evidence to argue SBF is guilty and said he was “greedy” while SBF's defense only made things worse  —  Mistakes aren't illegal, but fraud is — and Bankman-Fried's lawyers never made his defense land.




Elizabeth Lopatto / The Verge:

US v. SBF: in closing statements, the US relied heavily on evidence to argue SBF is guilty and said he was “greedy” while SBF's defense only made things worse  —  Mistakes aren't illegal, but fraud is — and Bankman-Fried's lawyers never made his defense land.



Source: TechMeme
Source Link: http://www.techmeme.com/231102/p7#a231102p7


Comments
new comment
Nobody has commented yet. Will you be the first?
 
Forum
Policy / Governance



Copyright 2012 through 2024 - National Cyber Warfare Foundation - All rights reserved worldwide.